FREEDOM AND DEMOCRATIZATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
The core issue of development is freedom. Development is not an enforceable project; it has to be achieved, it is only achieved when there is freedom for open and fearless deliberations.
People generally fail to understand the importance of freedom and also the content of freedom. Without making the concept philosophically complex, we can safely conclude that freedom is the capability to aspire and to achieve that aspiration. I'm here going to talk about one least-talked-about topic of science for the citizen.
Power has many roles, and one of its primary roles is to make policy for the course of action to attain a spelt-out objective. One such objective in every government is the policy of science and technology. Unfortunately, this is never debated in our political discourse. Neither media nor civil societies tend to raise their voices for this. However, any economic activity in modern times is a consequence of technology being employed. Digitization, automation, artificial intelligence, and machine learning are the wheels of technology today, and their existence and prevalence are the product of policies implemented to develop and import science and technology.
Unfortunately, this issue of science and technology policy is perceived as an elitist issue. However, the reality is that it is as much a people's issue as any policy like a policy of free rations, subsidized agriculture, rural housing, employment schemes, etc. Media miserably fails to agitate questions related to the involvement of citizen practitioners with science and technology on the policy front. Science and technology are issues of practical significance, and they must be brought out of the walls of research institutes and citadels of tech companies and billionaires. For example, the question of climate change cannot be resolved until the issues are not limited to COP summits. Deliberatiojns also have to be made among common citizens, to discuss their experiences, local practices, their age-old techniques, their livelihoods, their progress. Science and technology, tech summits, and public policies will remain unproductive until the common masses are not engaged constructively.
The adoption of technology is dependent on awareness, and awareness, in turn, is a product of education. So, education and media literacy are pivotal in this respect. And so, such questions should be put before our political leaders from the local self-government to the Parliament. Our emphasis on tech education and science graduation is only half-baked unless these things are not tagged with our demands for concrete policies.
When India faced a food crisis in the past, the Green Revolution was introduced, which was successfully adopted by the farmers. However, the incentive was only economic. If public participation could have steered it, we could have been able to simultaneously deal with the issues of water table fall, soil infertility, the menace of chemical fertilizers, etc. But we comfortably ignored them, and we did so because our agricultural policy was not well integrated with our science, education, and environmental policies. Policymakers committed this mistake as they ignored the role of public discourse and deliberate people's participation in policy formulation and execution. Even today, this top-down implementation is being done when the country is witnessing massive digitization. Again, this digitization is being done without making widespread arrangements for education in digital technology, media awareness about digitization, digital literacy, and evaluation of the impact on the population by the ongoing digitization project. This top-down digitization ignores the role of common citizens, and common citizens, as was the case with the Green Revolution, are just customers and not participants. This is again hindering the adequate assimilation of the citizen with the technology and the evaluation of the ongoing project and required course correction.
Hence, we need active media debate on the issue of public participation in science and technology policy and sister policies.
Training in Science and Technology(S&T) literacy has many dimensions like
1. Training in S&T as subjects of education
2. Training in S&T in form of awareness literacy
3. Training in S&T policy formulation
4. Training in S&T tools use
And this training involves many actors such as
1.Government
2.Universities and Tech Institutes
3.Civil Societies and NGOsworking in this field
4.Media as a source of campaign propagators and as a plateform for public debates
5.Students and Researchers
6.Citizens themselves
Training in Science and Technology literacy encompasses a multifaceted spectrum, and
Dimensions of S&T Literacy Training:
1. As subjects of education: This includes formal education in schools and universities, focusing on scientific methods, critical thinking, technological understanding, and problem-solving skills.
2. Awareness literacy: This aims to make the general public familiar with basic scientific concepts, technological advancements, and their impact on everyday life. It can involve campaigns, public talks, science museums, and media outreach.
3. Policy formulation: Equipping policymakers with S&T expertise allows them to make informed decisions on research funding, technology adoption, and ethical considerations surrounding scientific advancements.
4. Tools use: Training individuals in using various S&T tools, like software, data analysis programs, and digital communication platforms, empowers them to participate meaningfully in the technological era.
Actors involved in S&T Literacy Training:
1. Government: Responsible for developing national S&T literacy policies, funding educational programs, and promoting public awareness initiatives.
2. Universities and Tech Institutes: Play a crucial role in generating S&T knowledge, providing quality education, and conducting research that informs policy and awareness campaigns.
3. Civil Societies and NGOs: Actively engage in promoting S&T literacy through community outreach programs, workshops, citizen science initiatives, and advocacy for inclusive access to S&T knowledge.
4. Media: Acts as a vital bridge between experts and the public, disseminating information, sparking conversations, and facilitating public debates on S&T advancements and their implications.
5. Students and Researchers: As active participants in the S&T ecosystem, they can contribute to literacy efforts by volunteering, sharing their knowledge, and developing innovative teaching methods.
6. Citizens: Ultimately, everyone benefits from S&T literacy. Active participation in training programs, engaging in critical discussions, and holding policymakers accountable ensures equitable access and responsible use of S&T advancements.
By recognizing the diverse dimensions and actors involved, we can create holistic S&T literacy training programs that cater to different needs and empower individuals to navigate the increasingly complex world of science and technology.
However, the success of all such endeavors ultimately hinges on the degree of freedom present within a society. The proliferation of knowledge and the construction of wisdom are fundamentally dependent on the state of our minds. As we have discussed, freedom is the ability to aspire according to our values and to achieve those aspirations. Therefore, the extent and nature of this freedom directly determine the growth of science and technology, as well as the level of public participation in their advancement. If we cannot engage in open and fearless debate, then our freedom of will is curtailed, stifling both our capacity to innovate and our engagement with science and technology. In such situations, we become reliant on the benevolence of top-down policies, which may or may not grant us the opportunity to be active participants and innovators.
Freedom forms the very foundation of a thriving environment for science and technology (S&T) literacy and progress.
We must remember that a free mind, untangled by fear or constraint, is fertile ground for curiosity, exploration, and the exchange of ideas. This fosters the generation and sharing of knowledge, vital for S&T advancements.
True wisdom arises from diverse perspectives, critical discourse, and the freedom to challenge existing paradigms. In restrictive environments, such freedom is stifled, hindering the emergence of well-rounded understanding and innovative solutions.
Our understanding of freedom as the "capability to aspire and achieve that aspiration" perfectly captures the essence of the relationship between freedom and S&T. Only when individuals are free to set their own goals and pursue them without undue limitations can they contribute meaningfully to scientific and technological progress.
The dangers of restricted freedom:
Stifled debate and innovation: Fear and constraints act as shackles on discourse. Without open and courageous questioning, scientific inquiry stagnates, and potential breakthroughs remain unrealised.
Absence of volition: Under restricted freedom, individuals become mere followers, forced to comply with pre-determined agendas. This undermines the inherent drive to innovate and engage with S&T initiatives.
Dependence on top-down policies: When free participation is absent, progress hinges on the whims of external forces. These policies may or may not align with the needs and aspirations of the people, leading to inefficient and unsustainable development.
Consequences of restricted S&T literacy:
Unequal access and participation: Lack of access to S&T education and participation opportunities widens existing inequalities and prevents underprivileged communities from reaping the benefits of technological advancements.
Misinformed decisions: Without proper understanding of S&T concepts and their implications, public discourse around technological choices becomes vulnerable to misinformation and manipulation.
Ethical concerns: Restricted S&T literacy raises ethical concerns around data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the potential misuse of technology.
The way forward:
Nurturing a culture of freedom: Creating a society where open discussion, dissent, and critical thinking are encouraged is crucial for fostering a vibrant S&T ecosystem.
Democratizing S&T access: Equitable access to S&T education and resources empowers individuals to become active participants in shaping the future of technology.
Bridging the gap between policy and people: Engaging in open dialogue with the public, addressing their concerns, and incorporating their aspirations into policy decisions are essential for responsible and inclusive S&T development.
By recognizing the fundamental link between freedom and S&T literacy, we can strive to build a future where technology serves humanity, driven by knowledge, innovation, and the collective wisdom of empowered individuals.
Bridging the Chasm: Science, Technology, and the Public
As scientific advancements blossom, a disquieting reality emerges: ordinary people often perceive their benefits concentrated among a privileged few. This breeds skepticism, and in extreme cases, outright opposition to science and technology. Ignoring or stigmatizing such concerns is futile. Instead, true progress demands integration – actively involving the public in policy decisions, ensuring policies resonate with their values and aspirations, and demonstrating how science aligns with environmental conservation and societal well-being.
The chasm between experts and the public often runs deep, fueled by the specialized languages of science, technology, and policymaking. Experts must bridge this gap with simple, jargon-free communication, actively listen to public concerns, and engage in open dialogue. Only through inclusivity and clear communication can trust and understanding flourish.
This is particularly true in a culture where natural forces hold deep spiritual significance. Mocking traditional values is counterproductive. Instead, demonstrating how science complements such values, working hand-in-hand with nature for the common good, fosters positive acceptance. This approach is crucial in tackling pressing issues like the climate crisis, where aligning scientific solutions with environmental conservation not only safeguards our planet but also improves living standards and economic well-being – a goal shared by government, experts, and the public alike.
Ultimately, genuine progress lies in recognizing the inherent value of public participation, ensuring inclusivity in decision-making, and communicating complex ideas with clarity and accessibility. By building bridges of trust and understanding, we can ensure that science and technology not only advance, but also benefit all, fostering a brighter future for everyone.
This combined passage merges the previous sections into a cohesive whole, highlighting the core themes of public skepticism, inclusivity, bridging the communication gap, and aligning science with societal values. It emphasizes the shared goal of improving lives and encourages collaboration between experts and the public for a more sustainable and equitable future.
( As scientific advancements blossom, a disquieting reality emerges: ordinary people often perceive their benefits concentrated among a privileged few. This breeds skepticism, and in extreme cases, outright opposition to science and technology. Ignoring or stigmatizing such concerns is futile. Instead, true progress demands integration – actively involving the public in policy decisions, ensuring policies resonate with their values and aspirations, and demonstrating how science aligns with environmental conservation and societal well-being.
The chasm between experts and the public often runs deep, fueled by the specialized languages of science, technology, and policymaking. Experts must bridge this gap with simple, jargon-free communication, actively listen to public concerns, and engage in open dialogue. Only through inclusivity and clear communication can trust and understanding flourish.
This is particularly true in a culture where natural forces hold deep spiritual significance. Mocking traditional values is counterproductive. Instead, demonstrating how science complements such values, working hand-in-hand with nature for the common good, fosters positive acceptance. This approach is crucial in tackling pressing issues like the climate crisis, where aligning scientific solutions with environmental conservation not only safeguards our planet but also improves living standards and economic well-being – a goal shared by government, experts, and the public alike.
Ultimately, genuine progress lies in recognizing the inherent value of public participation, ensuring inclusivity in decision-making, and communicating complex ideas with clarity and accessibility. By building bridges of trust and understanding, we can ensure that science and technology not only advance, but also benefit all, fostering a brighter future for everyone.
This combined passage merges the previous sections into a cohesive whole, highlighting the core themes of public skepticism, inclusivity, bridging the communication gap, and aligning science with societal values. It emphasizes the shared goal of improving lives and encourages collaboration between experts and the public for a more sustainable and equitable future.
(- [Public engagement with science in India: Making the whole greater than the sum of its parts](^1^) by Sarah Iqbal and Banya Kar. This article discusses the challenges and opportunities of communicating science to the public in India, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. It also suggests some ways to integrate public engagement initiatives to make them more impactful and inclusive.
- [Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in academic literature and science policy](^2^) by Peter Weingart, Marina Joubert, and Karien Connoway. This article analyzes the development of the 'engagement' rhetoric in the science communication journals and science policy documents from the United Kingdom, the United States of America, the European Union, and South Africa. It also examines the variety of motives and the impact of public engagement with science on science policies.
- [Why Public Engagement Matters](^3^) by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). This article explains the benefits and challenges of public engagement with science, and provides some tips and resources for scientists and communicators who want to engage with the public effectively.
(1) Public engagement with science in India: Making the whole greater than .... https://indiabioscience.org/columns/opinion/public-engagement-with-science-in-india-making-the-whole-greater-than-the-sum-of-its-parts.
(2) Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in ... - PLOS. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0254201.
(3) Why Public Engagement Matters | American Association for the ... - AAAS. https://www.aaas.org/resources/communication-toolkit/what-public-engagement.
(4) Public Engagement with Science: What it Means - FromTheLabBench. http://www.fromthelabbench.com/from-the-lab-bench-science-blog/public-engagement-with-science-what-it-means.
(5) Experiments in engagement: Designing public engagement with science and .... https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0963662515620970.
(6) undefined. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254201.
(7) undefined. https://www.nrf.ac.za/division/rcce/instruments/research-chairs.)
Comments
Post a Comment